EU Vacancy: Believers In Little Green Men Need Not Apply

Conservative MEP for the East Midlands, Roger Helmer, who was due to step down and be replaced by Rupert Matthews in December, may not be stepping down after all, reports the Chronicle & Echo. The problem is that the Conservative Party HQ are a bit twitchy about Matthews’,  “unconventional interests”. Mr Matthews is an expert in the paranormal and also attracted controversy when he published a pamphlet on ‘Political Correctness’ which featured gollywogs on the cover. Mr Helmer fully backs Mr Matthews and will not step down until such time as there is more certainty regarding Mr Matthews position as his successor. A spokesman for the Conservative Party’s central office said: “We have to make a series of checks when there is a vacancy, if the next person on the list meets the criteria then they will be appointed.” One would have thought that a ‘series of checks’ would have been made before he was selected as one of the Conservatives five candidates on the EU list. One would have thought that someone who believes in little green men and other unexplained anomalies would be perfectly suited to deal with the fairy tales that emanate from Brussels and Strasbourg…or is be being black-balled for the golly’s?

Cut in Councillor Numbers Confirmed
The number of County Councillors (end therefore electoral divisions, or wards) in Northamptonshire will be reduced from 73 to 57 following an announcement by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE). What happens next is for the council to gerrymander decide the new boundaries for the 57 electoral divisions, and put it out to consultation. Council Leader, Conservative Jim ‘Hacker’ Harker said: “While the review hasn’t been instigated for cost-savings purposes, it nevertheless provides a potential saving of up to £350k over the next four years, subject to an allowances review, an important consideration in these financially-challenging times.” Translated from council gobbledegook into English, that means there will be no savings once the Councillors allowances have increased to take into account the increase in their division size. The idea is that each county councillor represents approximately the same number of people, as far as possible, and “the interests and identities of communities across the county”. Make sure you have your say, the commission is now asking local people for their input into the review of the electoral arrangements for Northamptonshire County Council. More details are available from the LGBCE website.

Local News and Brent Group Recommendation

It appears that the County Council’s question time event was a bit of a flop, with just 14 people, out of a county population rapidly approaching 1 million, turning up to ask questions of the proposed budget over the next 4 years. Maybe after last year’s street light switch off, the general consensus amongst the electorate is that the Council will do what they want anyway. If anyone who visits this blog did attend the meeting, can you let me know if the subject of the proposed £6m (or 1,100% increase) in spending on asylum seekers was challenged?

Bad news today for the Indian owned Corby steel works with 110 people – or 15% of its workforce, set to be laid off.

Linking to Paul Crofts blog is not something I would normally do, but to save me half inching his research, he has posted some interesting information about the New Chief Executive of Wellingborough Council, John Campbell. Interesting times may lay ahead!

I cannot sign off this blog without mentioning an e-mail that has been sent out by the Brent Group. As you may be aware, the Brent Group have been frustrated by Andrew Brons’ reluctance to break away from the BNP and form a new party. After a month or so of deliberating what they have decided to recommend to their members is that they join the only Nationalist Party whose leader has no baggage, the British Freedom Party.

I shall not repeat the full e-mail here but if anyone would like to see it to apply for the discounted membership, I shall forward it to them. The main thrust of the e-mail sent out by Roger Bennet is as follows:

As you are aware, over the last two years the British Nationalist cause has gone into serious decline.

As we are well aware of the cause of this decline, I will not dwell on the past two years, but only the immediate past months.

After the BNP leadership election many of us wanted and prepared for a new party to be formed by Andrew Brons MEP. At that time there were many nationalists not supporting the old party who were looking to join a new political party. Unfortunately, a new party did not emerge and many past supporters have drifted away. 200 members attended the meeting of the 22nd. October 2011, in the belief that a new party was then to be formed, myself included.

The majority of Brent Group members see no value in further delay and  inform me they want positive action now.

The time has gone for a new party to have any chance of success. Too much time has been lost, many potential members no longer there.

I formed the Brent Group, well before the 22nd. October, in the South West, purely to keep our ex South Somerset BNP officers together.  Since that time the Group has expanded beyond expectation with members joining from most parts of the UK, including members who have formed groups and are looking for an organisation to be part of and work for.  Looking for mutual support and an efficient organisation.

The choice is not wide.

I will not denigrate the efforts of others as we are all nationalists doing the best that we can. However, our cause has fragmented into too many small parties. Most of whom if any, will not have the success we all desire. We need a party that is a party of the 21st, century and not rooted in the early 20th century as is the BNP, and most of the other parties.

How do we define success ?

Success is winning votes, winning seats and controlling councils, eventually to win seats in National government. If we cannot achieve this, we are achieving nothing, gaining nothing.

By being overtly nationalist and racist in policies will not win seats in councils, will not gain control of councils. We must raise our game, become more subtle, more professional in our approach. We must have policies on all aspects of life in the UK. Immigration most certainly, which only we will deal with efficiently, but in addition, a wide range of policies and  a party run in a democratic and open manner. No officers appointed, only elected. With party accounts open, on demand, to all members. A party where every member is equal and valued.

After closely examining all the present parties I have come to the conclusion, with others, that the only party that is truly growing, and fits the standards we require, is the British Freedom Party. I have special knowledge of British Freedom as I was a founder member, along with several ex SW BNP officers.

The present Chairman, recently elected, is Paul Weston. Mr Weston has never been a member of the BNP and has no past history of extremism. In other words there is no dirt the media can dish on Paul Weston.

We have suffered terminally in the past by representatives of our parties having past histories easily exposed and held to ridicule by, not just our political enemies, but by the media in general.

The Brent Group, now a sizable organisation, has a great deal of talent within its ranks. Not only past officers of experience but young members who have never been members of the BNP asking me what positive action they can take to advance the cause and the principles in which we believe.

By the members of the Brent Group joining with British Freedom Party we will create a powerful force that many nationalists have been waiting for, combining  experience with enthusiasm and manpower. That is also lady power of course as we have some of the most dedicated and hard working members in our ladies section.

Other Freedom parties in Europe are pleased to link with the British Freedom Party but will not associate with the BNP or similar groups in the UK.

The Freedom Parties in Europe have achieved great success, far more success than did the BNP at its highest point. These are parties with members of parliament, who have gained control of councils and are increasing their membership. We must aim at achieving this level of success in order to take our country back.

I sincerely believe this is the only way forward, in fact, the only real game in town.

I would ask you to support this proposal.

As I said, there is more, if anyone wants the whole thing please get in touch.

I am sure the BFP have the right intentions, my only doubt is with the links this party is said to have with the English Defence League. If these links are true, any trouble associated with the EDL, whether they are blameless or not, will be used to hit the fledgling BFP with. Personally, I will continue to reserve judgement on joining, but will continue to work with any party furthering the cause of both English and British Nationalism.

Burka Ban Bill Binned

Kettering MP Philip Hollobone’s Face Coverings (Regulation) Bill has failed to get a second reading on the last day for consideration of backbench MP Bills  in this parliamentary session. What that means is that the proposed legislation will go no further…unless a new proposal is submitted at some point in the future. Mr Hollobone has previously described the burka as offensive and “against the British way of life”.

Philip Hollobone has in the past week also criticised the proposal for the retail development at the Skew Bridge site near Rushden, even though it is outside of his constituency. I wish the MP for the area, Peter Bone would do the same, while the development may create employment in an area people will need to drive to, jobs will be lost in several town centres around the area as a result. With this and the major development at Stanton Cross, Wellingborough and other development proposals the towns of Wellingborough, Rushden, Higham Ferrers and Irthlingborough will begin to lose their individual identities as they merge into one another to become an amalgamated major conurbation

By-election Round up
Reports from Towcester are that the Lib Dems are throwing a lot of resource into the two by-elections in the town. With no Labour candidate to vote for, the Lib Dems probably see themselves as the alternative vote for the left as they are up against three parties of the right. The local issues for the District council election will concern the development of Towcester town centre and the expansion proposed to the south of the town…and the relocation of the council offices, while the County Council election issues will focus on the departure of the previous incumbent, Rosemary Bromwich and street lighting. As with all local elections, National issues will also come into play.

Labour Cock-up Towcester by-elections

The by-elections in Towcester are going to be interesting if nothing else.

For the Towcester Brook by-election for South Northamptonshire District Council it is a three way fight between the Conservatives, Lib Dems and UKIP. In the Towcester Division for the County Council seat it is a four way battle between the above three and the British National Party. I can hear you all cry, WHAT!, no Labour? Well, they did enter nomination paperwork for both seats, but their nominations were refused as they did not supply the electoral numbers of nominees. Good to see the Labour Party in such disarray they cannot even find a competent person to fill in electoral paperwork correctly?

Council Budget Consultation
Northamptonshire County Council are holding a budget consultation at the Council chamber, County Hall, on Tuesday, January 24th from 7:00 to 9:00pm. If you wish to ask some probing questions such as ‘Why has it been proposed that the budget for asylum seeking be increased by £6m for the next financial year when cuts are being made elsewhere?’ The council must be expecting a large turnout as they are asking people to register their place.

Barclaycard Set To Export Yet More Jobs?

Barclaycard, who have their headquarters at Brackmills, Northampton, have a habit of off-shoring jobs, and it sounds as if there are more to come. The company announced yesterday that it is to shed 422 posts across the country. The department being hit this time is Barclays technology and infrastructure divisions. While the majority of these losses will come from around the country, it is expected that between 30-50 jobs could be axed at Brackmills. Barclays denied allegations from union leaders that work was being transferred to Lithuania, saying the cuts were part of “essential changes” to its technology and infrastructure division.” What they didn’t say was where the jobs are going. People with a Barclaycard need to study data protection laws to ensure that their information is going to remain safe. David Fleming, national officer of the Unite union, “Unite has strongly opposed the sending of some of this work to Lithuania, when there are already highly-trained workers carrying out this work. Strange how the Unions are suddenly opposed to off-shoring when there is a conservative let government yet they were quieter than a church mouse when thousands of jobs were offshored under the Blair/Brown Labour governments.

Wind Power – Councillor Quits Tories Over Wind Farm
Tony Scott, who represents villages including Badby, Catesby, Hellidon, Newnham and Staverton on Daventry District Council (DDC) has quit the Conservatives and will now sit as an independent councillor. The Daventry Express reports Cllr Scott as saying: “I have been a DDC Conservative councillor for the ward of Badby for the last 12 years. While I continue to support the current administration I want it to be known that I do not support a number of central Government policies. Following the recent undemocratic decision of the planning inspector to overturn the council planning committee’s resolution and approve the application to build two wind farms at Watford and Kelmarsh, in line with Government policy, was a step too far. As a result I have resigned from the Conservative party and will continue to represent my constituents as an independent councillor. To show the Government our complete disdain at its blind determination to blight our countryside with expensive and useless machines I would urge my colleagues to do the same.” Well said that man, if only the Tory Party MP’s with the same feelings had the balls to do the same!

Other Developments
While we’re on the subject of Daventry District Council, the Planning committee has refused proposals for 150 new homes on a greenfield site in Brixworth. No doubt the planners will go to appeal. See the local Brixworth Residents Against New Estates website.

Meanwhile on the other side of the county, East Northamptonshire District Council have given the go ahead for 125 houses on the old Hospital at Wymington Road, Rushden. The move has angered many locals as the local green will also be developed too.

Development, or lack of development, on Brownfield sites is also an issue in Northampton according to the Chronicle and Echo. There are several former school sites sitting empty, yet planners are being given approval for green field sites. This situation is absolutely ludicrous. For the full story, see the Chron story “Council criticised for only selling three of 16 former Northampton school sites, valued at £90m in 2007, for less than £5m“

Some good news for the North of the county, the North Northamptonshire Joint Planning Unit has revised their figures for new houses needed by 2024 from 56,000, down to 28,000. Bearing in mind that many of these have already been, or in the process of being built, it is a little bit of respite for our former green and pleasant land.

Who Will Pop Up In Towcester?
With the deadline for nominations at 12 noon today for Towcester Brook by-election for South Northamptonshire District Council and the Towcester Division by-election for the County Council, there is no official notification of runners and riders on either the South Northants or County Council websites as I type. If they appear I will add an update to this post.

Northampton University and The Metropolitan Police Service

 by Tony Shell

The Radicalism and The New Media group (the RNM Group) is based at the University of Northampton, and was established in 2009.¹ The declared aim of the RNM group is to: “bring together experts in Law, History, Media and Psychology from across the University, to work with organisations including the Police, Local Authorities and the Home Office”” – with the RNM Group reporting that: “Projects already underway  include collaboration with regional Police authorities to look at public safety and radicalisation. The [RNM] Group is also in direct contact with SO15 [The Counter Terrorism Specialist Operations branch within London's Metropolitan Police Service] …” ²

The Counter Terrorism Command (the CTC, also designated as SO15) is based within the Metropolitan Police Service in London. The duties of the CTC, through its National Co-ordinator Domestic Extremism section (NCDE)³, include intelligence gathering and the policing of public protest.⁴ The CTC works closely with both the UK Security Service (MI5) and the Secret Intelligent Service (MI6) – as well as with the law enforcement and intelligence agencies of other countries.

On the 25th November 2011 the Metropolitan Police Service was asked: “whether or not the Home Office approved the working contacts between the Metropolitan Police Service (the MPS) and the Radicalism and New Media Research Group (the RNM Group)? Who approved and authorised that particular collaborative effort?”⁵ A response was received from a representative of the Specialist Operations (SO15) branch of The Metropolitan Police, on the 5th January 2012, saying: “I can confirm that Assistant Chief Constable Setchell, who was the head of the National Public Order Intelligence Unit, commissioned RNMG to undertake academic research relating to public protest.”⁶

The University of Northampton’s RNM Group claims to be concerned with ‘radicalism’. However it is considered most extraordinary that the RNM Group shows no interest in the problems of Islamist radicalism and terrorism – especially so, given that independent research shows that: “ … Since then [the1990s], British universities have consistently acted as breeding grounds for extremism, with British university graduates joining jihadist movements in Iraq, Kashmir, Israel and elsewhere⁷

Other research has shown that: “More than 30% of individuals involved in Islamist terrorism in the UK were educated to degree level or higher. Of these, 19 individuals studied at a UK university; 16 were graduates; three were postgraduate students and one had achieved a postgraduate qualification. At least four individuals involved in acts of terrorism in the UK were senior members of their university ISOC [Islamic Society] and a further six were studying at a UK university at the time of arrest.” Interviews, concluded as part of that research, have also revealed: “students who are active in their university Islamic society were twice as likely as non-members to hold extreme views, including that killing in the name of religion was justified … Three fifths of active ISOC members said killing in the name of religion can be justified” ⁸

The attitude of the RNM Group appears to be very clear – that those within the UK who are driven to anger by Islamist extremism and terrorism, and who express that anger through protest, should be subject to ridicule, vilification and “curtailment”.⁹ What, therefore, should we conclude?

However it is of crucial importance to distinguish between the teachers of hate – and the vulnerable (and often very impressionable) students who are subjected to such odious forms of political control.

From the material published by the RNM Group, it seems very clear that the Group believes it’s work to be more than just an investigation of public protest, but has clear political purpose – and that that purpose is given State endorsement through the involvement of the Metropolitan Police Service. In the space of just two years the RNM Group has established close working links with senior UK police officers, including representatives for the National Coordinator Domestic Extremism (NCDE) within the CTC¹⁰ – as well as with extremist political groups including the US-based Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the USbased Political Research Associates (PRA), and the UK-based Searchlight organization. ^11,12,13

It is the activities of the SPLC, the PRA and Searchlight that provides the clearest insights into the intended political nature of the academia/police (Northampton-RNM/SO15) collaboration. It is drawn from a ‘progressive’ ideology that concocts political justification for: anti-native hatemongering;^14,15 mass immigration;^{16, 17} abortion as “reproductive justice”;^{18, 19} the injection of hate narrative into the Criminal Justice System; ²⁰ the use of ‘false flag’ deceptions and violence;^{21, 22} the undermining and destruction of Christian heritage;^{23, 24, 25} and the psycho-sociological abuse of children and infants.²⁶

There is a refusal by the ‘progressives’ to engage in debate, with vigorous attempts to suppress counterarguments through the use of personal attacks, smears, innuendo, misrepresentation, and abusive comment.²⁷ In particular, and in the context of this report, there appears to be an attempt to stifle legitimate concerns regarding the presence of University-based Islamist extremism.²⁸

A posture of craven appeasement to the aggressive demands of both political ‘progressivism’ and Islamist extremism has been adopted by the offices of Government and State – and most especially so, within the Home Office, and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. This has been fully exposed in a detailed investigation, based on leaked HO and FCO documents, by The Policy Exchange in 2006.²⁹

Such research strongly indicates that the main aim of the State has been, through appeasement, to prevent political or revolutionary Islamists becoming violent Islamists or Salafi-jihadists. However the recommendations from such research is that that approach is wrong, and that all Islamist (political) ideology should be directly challenged – with appropriate ‘ways and means’ being incorporated into an updated version of the Government’s CONTEST/PREVENT strategy.³⁰ However it is very disturbing to see that there are still calls for the State to appease political Islamists and jihadists.³¹

In regard to concerns raised in this report, the conclusions of a study into Islamist extremism by the Quilliam Foundation are especially relevant. The researchers recommended that: “Assessment and inspection regimens need to be improved to ensure that lecturers and teachers who subscribe to an extreme ideology are not using their academic positions to spread their ideology to students, as is currently the case in several university campuses.”³² Yes, quite so. A copy of this report is being sent to the Special Operations branch of The Metropolitan Police Service, at New Scotland Yard, with a strong recommendation that the MPS sever all links with the Northampton University RNM Group.

END

Notes and References

1 ‘Radicalism and New Media – about us’, Radicalism and New Media Research Group at the University of Northampton’, downloaded on the 2nd November 2011

2 ‘Counterterrorism Review at The University of Northampton, Radicalism and New Media Research Group at the University of Northampton’, 05 2010, source: http://www.radicalism-new-media.org/?p=196 downloaded on the 25th November 2011

3 ‘About NCDE’, the Association of Police Officers, downloaded on the 10th April 2011 from the ACPO website: http://www.acpo.police.uk/NationalPolicing/NCDENationalCoordinatorDomesticExtremism/AboutNCDE.aspx

4 ‘ACPO Job Description: Head of Confidential Intelligence Unit (CIU), National Public Order Intelligence Unit (NPOIU)’, undated, p2454 Thames Valley Police, references to CIU activities, as a part of the NPIOU, NCDE of ACPO TAM, and to the use of CHIS assets,

5 The Metropolitan Police Service failed to acknowledge receipt of the letter of the 25th November 2011. Therefore a further letter was sent on the 9th December 2011, again requesting information regarding collaboration between the MPS and the RNM Group.

6 Letter received from the Specialist Operations branch of The Metropolitan Police Service, New Scotland Yard, on the 5th January 2012 (letter dated 20th December 2011).

7 ‘British Universities Continue to Breed Extremists’, by James Brandon, CTC Sentinel January 2011 Volume 4 Issue 1, Combating terrorism Centre at West Point

8 ‘Radical Islam on UK Campuses – A Comprehensive List of Extremist Speakers at UK Universities’, The Centre for Social Cohesion, April 2010

9 For example, the so called ‘Unite Against Fascism’ – a racist (anti-white/English) hatemongering organisation that routinely mobilises young people to physically oppose those protesting against Islamist extremism and jihadism. Protestors are abusively labelled as “fascists”, “Nazis”, et cetera. Support for the UAF is drawn predominantly from within the universities and colleges (students and staff). See: ‘Institutionalised Extremism’, by Tony Shell, first published in the independent newspaper UK Column, issue No 3, 2011

10 ‘Forthcoming Conference: Think Global, Hate Local: Britain’s Far-Right in Focus’, 15th April 2011, Radicalism and New Media Research Group at the University of Northampton’, downloaded on the 8th November 2011. Particpants included the police (NCDE), and the extremist political organization Searchlight.

11 ‘Fascist Radicalism and The New Media’, Symposium at The University of Northampton Park Campus, 17th September 2010, conference call, downloaded on the 7th November 2011. Participants included the extremist political group Searchlight.

12 ‘Links: Radicalism and New Media – Radicalism and New Media Research Group at the University of Northampton’, downloaded from: http://www.radicalism-new-media.org on the 31st October 2011. Lists include to the extremist political organizations Southern Poverty Law Center (US-based), Political Research Associates (US-based), and Searchlight (UK-based).

13 ‘Editorial October 2011’, Searchlight Magazine

14 An anti-native ideology therefore features prominently within the RNM Group’s political output. A recent report by the RNM Group states: “The opening keynote was delivered by Hans-Georg Betz, who gave a fascinating lecture about populism, nativism and its legacies in contemporary far-wing [sic] ideology. This set the tone for the entire conference, and throughout the day, academics presented in parallel sessions exploring the far right across Europe today”. The derogatory attribution of “nativism” to native people of Europe exposes a contempt towards those native people (such as the English). See: ‘Conference Report on Populist Racism in Britain and Europe Since 1945’, reference to a lecture by Hans-George Betz on ‘nativism’, second paragraph, Radicalism and New Media Group, University of Northampton, 19th November 2011, downloaded on the 23rd November 2011

15 Such as in the bizarre assumption of the RNM Group that the report: ‘Colin Jordan’s “Merry England” and “Universal Nazism”’, (Dr. Paul Jackson, Radicalism and New Media, Working Papers, Volume 1, No 2, May 2011) has any kind of contemporary relevance. However the choice of this subject, as a seminal piece of RNM Group research, indicates how the RNM Group prefer to see the English people (and how it wishes the English to be seen by others, including members of the ethnic minority community).

16 ‘A Guide to Understanding The Tactics of The Southern Poverty Law Center in The Immigration Debate’, Federation for American Immigration Reform’, September 2009

17 The linking of “nativism” with “the far right” is a political construct used to demonize native populations, and to justify the creation of a racist political State able (ultimately) to pursue population replacement. See, for example: ‘Genocide – A Modern Crime’, by Dr. Raphael Lemkin, Free World magazine, Vol.4, April 1945, pages 39-43, ‘Techniques of Genocide’

18 See, for example, ‘Continued Threats to Reproductive Rights’, The Public Eye, a publication for the Political Research Associates, Fall 2009, Volume XXIV, No 3, pages 3 and 6, reference: pe-fall-09.pdf

19 ‘Polished Lenses and Focused Targets: Defending Reproductive Justice’, by Pam Chamberlain, Political Research Associates, 2009, source: http://www.publiceye.org/ark/reproductive-justice/new-overview.php

20 For example: Although a North American organization, the PRA recently launched a vitriolic attack against the UK-based Fathers4Justice movement (F4J). The F4J movement was formed to raise public awareness regarding court judgments following a divorce that (through intervention by the State-run Child Support Agency) have all-too-often resulted in the access of fathers to their children being severely limited (or denied). The PRA claims that: “By deliberately spreading misinformation, father’s rights groups have managed to shift the grounds for discussion about violence against women from a feminist challenge to men’s physical power to a male-centered attack on women”. What is very evident, here, is the totally dishonest tactic of conflating two different issues of domestic violence (that is committed by both men and women), and that of the natural right of a father to have access to his children. It is a tactic driven by political dogma, by an extremist ideology that purposefully seeks to foment distrust, hate and conflict. The final conclusions of the PRA article on this subject state: “Practitioners of feminine family law … should alert progressive judicial watchdogs to scour the courts for changes in patterns of legal judgments. Such vigilance will reduce the amount of havoc such groups [as the F4J] can inflict on women, children and the culture as a whole.” This is therefore an attempt by political extremists to introduce crude political ‘hate narrative’ into judicial proceedings. It is totally contrary to the principles of Common Law. See: Father’s Rights Groups Threaten Women’s Gains – And Their Safety’, by Pam Chamberlain, The Public Eye, a publication of the Political Research Associates, Spring 2011, Volume XXVI, No 1, page 20.

21 Recently published research has exposed the past involvement of senior Searchlight staff in helping to establish; giving assistance to; and of representing far right groups within England (from the mid-1970s onwards). It is now known that those groups were linked to neo-Nazi gangs, located within the European mainland, and operated by the foreign section of the East German Ministerium für Staatssicherheit (the MfS/HVA, under Markus Wolf). See: ‘State Instigated, False Flag Terrorism’, by Tony Shell, October 2011, document reference: special_projects_07.pdf, first published in the UK Column, issue No 4 2011

22 In 1980, a leaked London Weekend Television memorandum revealed that Searchlight had been feeding the news media with ‘intelligence’ information on UK-based left-wing activists supportive of the PLO. Such behaviour (in 1977) is one of the earliest demonstrations of Searchlight’s anti-nativist extremism (in that particular case, with regard to the struggle of Palestinian people within the Occupied Territories). The New Statesman article (that exposed the LWT/Searchlight memo) also revealed evidence of other ‘dirty tricks’ being used against pro-Palestinian groups – including efforts by agent provocateurs to create an appearance of “violent anti-Semitism” within those groups. See: ‘Destabilising the Decent People’, Duncan Campbell, Bruce Page and Nick Anning, The New Statesman, 15th February 1980. Analysis of the ‘LWT memorandum, 2nd May 1977’ is based upon a London Library copy of the original New Statesman article.

23 For example, of making unsubstantiated accusations against a prominent US-based conservative Christian, and pro-life supporter, of having: “served an array of unpleasantness around the world: Latin American death squads, anti-abortion and anti-gay extremists, theocratic Christian nationalists, faith-based fascists and covert CIA operations.” Reference: ‘Disciples of Blood’, by Michael Reynolds, Searchlight Magazine, March 2003, pages 30-31. The source is scanned images from the original magazine, obtained from the University of Glasgow.

24 ‘The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Hate-mongers – On The Southern Poverty Law Center’, by John Vennari, Catholic Family News, source: http://www.cfnews.org/SPLC.htm

25 For example the attempt by Chip Berlet, a senior analyst for Political Research Associates, and close associate of the RNM Group, to connect the murderous attacks by Anders Breivik in Oslo on the 22nd July 2011 to the “Christian Right”, to a “reconstituted and traditionalist Catholic Church” and to “European Christendom”. This dangerous nonsense was spouted by Bertlet (and repeated by others) despite the fact that Breivik was not a Christian (he was a member of the Masonic Brotherhood). Significantly, it is now known that Anders Breivik had three particular targets for assassination on the island of Utøya: Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, former Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland, and AUF (Workers’ Youth League of the Norwegian Labour Party) leader Eskil Petersen. These three people were very active in Norway (and throughout the World) in promoting Palestinian rights, for Palestine to be granted recognition as a sovereign state by the United Nations, and for a boycott of Israel in protest to the conditions in Gaza and the West Bank. See: ‘Analysing Breivik’s Ideology with Social Network Research’, by Chip Bertlet, e-Extreme, Volume 12 No 3 October 2011; and ‘Breivik and His Enablers’, by Roger Cohen, The New York Times, 25th July 2011, reference source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/26/opinion/26iht-edcohen26.html

26 Of, for example, the sexualisation of children and infants for the purpose of exploitation and control; the promotion of moral relativism and amoral thinking; ‘race awareness’ training; encouraging contempt for parental care and authority; and the inculcation of unjustified feelings of anger, grievance, guilt or shame based according to ethnic or ‘racial’ identity (re. ‘critical whiteness studies’).

27 Much of the style and content of the work of the RNM Group appears to have been drawn from the SPLC. In March 2010 Pulitzer-Prize-winning journalist Kerry Kammer published a damning report on that organization – and, most especially, on the manner in which the SPLC indulges in hatemongering against so called “nativist extremists”. Mr. Kammer concludes by observing: “In the name of defending democracy, it [the SPLC] seeks to stifle one of democracy’s most vital functions, the vigorous discussion of important public issues. It demonstrates that the Southern Poverty Law Center has become a peddler of its own brand of selfrighteous hate. It is a center of intolerance, marked by a poverty of ideas, a dependence on dishonesty, and a lack of fundamental decency.” See: ‘Immigration and the SPLC: How The Southern Poverty Law Center Invented a Smear, Served La Raza, Manipulated The Press, and Duped Its Donors’, by Jerry Kammer, the Center for Immigration Studies, March 2010, source: Http://www.cis.org/immigration-splc

28 Disingenuously referred to as “Islamophobia” – a political illness

29‘When Progressives Treat With Reactionaries – The British State’s Flirtation With Radical Islam’, by Martin Bright, Policy Exchange, July 2006

30 ‘Preventing Terrorism: Where Next For Britain?’, [Strategic Briefing Paper for Charles Farr, Director General For The Office For Security and Counter Terrorism, The Home Office – NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE], edited and presented by Maajid Nawaz, The Quilliam Foundation, 14th June 2010.

31 ‘Islamic Terrorism in The UK Since 9/11: Reassessing The “Soft” Approach’, by Jay Edwards and Benoit Gomis, International Security Programme Paper – ISP PP 2011/03, Chatham House, June 2011

32 ‘Preventing Terrorism: Where Next For Britain?’, [Strategic Briefing Paper for Charles Farr, Director General For The Office For security and Counter Terrorism, The Home Office – NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE], edited and presented by Maajid Nawaz, The Quilliam Foundation, 14th June 2010 – Business and Innovation Skills (BIS) section.

8,000 Somalis Live In Northampton

A story appearing on the Chronicle & Echo website today reveals that there are now an estimated 8,000 Somali’s living in Northampton. This is double the figure of just three years ago. I understand that Somalia is an ungovernable war ravaged hell hole thanks to muslim terrorist groups, but why are the Somali’s flocking to the UK…and Northampton in particular when they have passed through numerous safe countries beforehand…and who are the fools that have granted them the right to remain here? I would like to see the UK Border agency investigate every single member of this foundation to see how many of them are here illegally and take the appropriate actions to get them removed.

Getting back to the story, the Northamptonshire Somali Development Foundation (NSDF) which has been based at the Rainbow Centre, in Sheep Street, Northampton for four years are protesting against a two-week eviction notice. The foundation has 4,000 active members. Secretary Cabdik Cabdi said: “We’re not just dealing with an individual, it’s a whole community. Everyone I’ve spoken to is saying they don’t know where to go and that breaks my heart as a leader. This is the only centre we’ve got between the 8,000 Somalis living in Northampton.” Us Brits keep being told how good it is to integrate with ethnic minorities, yet it appears these minorities want to be on their own…in very large numbers. The group received the eviction notice last month from Northampton’s Afro Caribbean Elders Society (ACES), which occupies the ground floor of the centre and subcontracts the space to NSDF. The letter informed the group it would be evicted on January 6, despite the contract running until September this year. Is this the Afro Caribbean community being racist… or is it Ethnic Cleansing?  Mr Cabdi felt the foundation, which he said had helped to reduce town centre crime, had been singled out, as the Northampton Retail Crime Initiative, which also uses the centre, had not been asked to leave. Will this raise tensions between the Somali and Afro Caribbean communities in Northampton? We’ll have to wait and see.

Official…Immigrants Take UK Jobs!
The government’s official advisers on migration say there is a link between immigration from outside the European Union and job losses among UK workers, according to a report on the BBC website…well, no shit Sherlock. The Migration Advisory Committee said there were 23 fewer UK jobs for every 100 migrants from outside the EU. The Migration Advisory Committee (Mac) estimates 160,000 British-born workers’ jobs have been “displaced” following non-EU immigration between 1995 and 2010.

133 Different Languages Spoken In Northampton Schools

The Northampton Chronicle & Echo reports today that 133 different languages, including Zulu, are spoken by children in primary schools in Northamptonshire. The figures are a result of a Freedom of Information request by the paper and highlights the increasing range of ethnic backgrounds of pupils studying in county primary schools. Figures from a school census taken last year and one in 2007 show that the amount of children speaking some languages has increased dramatically. For example, the number of Polish speaking children has increased in the past four years from 300 to 974 and the number of children speaking Bengali has increased from 203 to 481. Top 15 languages, other than English are Polish, Bengali*, Somali, Gujarati, Panjabi*, Swahili*, Shona, Urdu, Malayalam, Romanian, Chinese*, Latvian, Russian, Lithuanian and Albanian. * indicates all dialects.

The Joys of Multiculturalism
Another story that appeared in the Chronicle & Echo in December revealed that how Police in Northampton are increasingly targeting cases of honour-based violence, race hate crimes and female genital mutilation, as more immigrants settle in the town. More and more police time is being taken up dealing with hate crimes, liaising with diverse ethnic groups and cracking down on honour-based violence. The two constable interviewed said that it was hard to put a figure on how big the county’s ethnic communities were now. However, alongside long-standing immigrant groups they now deal with more people from places such as Somalia, Poland and Afghanistan settling here. May I hasten to add that all those claiming asylum here from Somalia or Afghanistan are technically illegal immigrants as they would have passed through numerous safe countries to arrive in the UK. The two constables said each group brought with it individual challenges to policing. Immigrants from Somalia arrive in the UK from a country with little or no law and order, while Eastern Europeans could often have a low opinion of authorities. They have also helped women who have been affected by female genital mutilation, or female circumcision, which is practised in parts of Africa and Asia. Some Polish drivers in the county created problems on the roads through lack of legal knowledge.

There Goes Another Farm
The Daventry Express reveals that building on a new 1,000 home green field Daventry estate will be under way within a year after a deal was struck from housebuilders Crest Nicholson. The 120-acre Monskmoor Farm site on the edge of the town lies to the east of Welton Lane, across from Lang Farm, and stretches from the Country Park roundabout to the Grand Union Canal. It was given outline planning permission in March 2010. Monksmoor Farm was one of the three big urban extension plans – along with Danetre Village and Churchfields – proposed for the town. After a lengthy inquiry only Monksmoor was given permission with the planning inspector saying the existing roads and other infrastructure could ‘just about’ sustain the extra 1,000 homes. The 10-year development programme will create mainly low density family housing with Crest Nicholson planning for the first people to move in during summer 2013.

Diane Abbott
The authorities  need to show consistency between Emma West and Diane Abbott. If one is to be charged with racism, so must the other. A hate Crime is committed when one or a group of people, perceive someone to have said something that racially offends them, and Diane Abbot has certainly offended a lot of people.

If Diane Abbott’s comments offended you sign the petition below:

We the people are signing the petition asking the authorities to show consistency and either treat Emma West the same as Diane Abbott and drop all charges if she makes a public apology or treat Diane Abbott the same as Emma West and arrest Diane Abbott for committing a “racially aggravated hate speech”.

http://www.facebook.com/dialog/oauth?api_key=27625357694&app_id=27625357694&channel_url=https%3A%2F%2Fs-static.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fconnect%2Fxd_proxy.php%3Fversion%3D3%23cb%3Df290aea2f0447ec%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fnorthantspatriot.wordpress.com%252Ff3777fb7abed424%26relation%3Dparent.parent%26transport%3Dpostmessage&client_id=27625357694&display=none&locale=en_US&origin=1&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fs-static.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fconnect%2Fxd_proxy.php%3Fversion%3D3%23cb%3Df23b012c8699b3c%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fnorthantspatriot.wordpress.com%252Ff3777fb7abed424%26relation%3Dparent%26transport%3Dpostmessage%26frame%3Df2a2ee827dfd698&response_type=token%2Csigned_request%2Ccode&sdk=joey

Have You Heard Of The Rainbow Bridge Festival?

Neither had I until I was having a nose about on the internet this morning. The event is supported and organised by the usual suspects of the great unwashed, and according to the blurb on their facebook page  it claims

This exciting new festival is a multi-cultural family friendly event for the whole community, celebrating our diversity challenging discrimination and bringing the whole community closer together.

It is supported by The Umbrella Fair but remains an independent event. The theme is one of reconciliation, of St George and the Dragon making peace and living in harmony

The event which was held last year, will be held again this year on the Racecourse, Northampton on the 28th April. Seeing as this event is all about celebrating diversity, challenging discrimination, reconciliation, St George, making peace and living in harmony, I wonder if they would allow a stall from a group promoting local history, culture and Englishness in general?

Lost In Translation – £218,000 of Northants Tax Payers Money

The Chronicle and Echo reports that over the past two years, Northamptonshire County Council has spent £218,307 translating official documents into 65 different foreign languages and providing interpreters. A spokesman for Northamptonshire County Council said it was the council’s legal responsibility to provide translation services for people if they were needed, which is in fact a lie. There is only a legal requirement to provide translation in certain instances. The cost to taxpayers for translations in 2009-10 was £142,877. That bill was reduced to £75,430 in 2010-11. The languages written translation was provided for in 2011 were Albanian, Amharic, Arabic, Bengali, Cantonese, Catalan, Chinese, Croatian, Czech, Dari (Afghani), Dutch, English, Farsi, French, German, Greek, Gujarati, Hindi, Hungarian, Italian, Kurdish, Kurdish-Sorani, Latvian, Lithuanian, Malayalam, Mandarin, Norwegian, Pashto, Polish, Portuguese, Punjabi, Pushto, Romanian, Russian, Serbian, Shona, Slovak, Somali, Spanish, Swahili, Tamil, Thai, Tigrinya, Turkish, Twi, Urdu, Vietnamese, Yoruba and Zulu while the following languages can be added to the list for face to face translation Bulgarian, Kurdish-Badini, Kurdish-Kirmanji, Mongolian, Persian, Phillipino, Sylheti, Tagalog.

While we’re on the subject of your council tax being wasted, the amount spent by the council on looking after asylum seeking children in care in the county shows no sign of abating with the figures for September and October being £250,112.49p and £235,120.85p respectively. The council have proposed an increase in the amount budgeted for asylum seeing children in the next year from £500,000 to over £6m to account for the reduction in Government subsidy for their inability to control the nations borders.